Note: This content is accessible to all versions of every browser. However, this browser does not seem to support current Web standards, preventing the display of our site's design details.

  

Practical Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for Learning-Based MPC with Linear Models

Author(s):

A. Aswani, P. Bouffard, X. Zhang, C. J. Tomlin
Conference/Journal:

vol. http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.2843
Abstract:

Learning-based control methods are an attractive approach for addressing performance and efficiency challenges in robotics and automation systems. One such technique that has found application in these domains is learning-based model predictive control (LBMPC). An important novelty of LBMPC lies in the fact that its robustness and stability properties are independent of the type of online learning used. This allows the use of advanced statistical or machine learning methods to provide the adaptation for the controller. This paper is concerned with providing practical comparisons of different optimization algorithms for implementing the LBMPC method, for the special case where the dynamic model of the system is linear and the online learning provides linear updates to the dynamic model. For comparison purposes, we have implemented a primal-dual infeasible start interior point method that exploits the sparsity structure of LBMPC. Our open source implementation (called LBmpcIPM) is available through a BSD license and is provided freely to enable the rapid implementation of LBMPC on other platforms. This solver is compared to the dense active set solvers LSSOL and qpOASES using a quadrotor helicopter platform. Two scenarios are considered: The first is a simulation comparing hovering control for the quadrotor, and the second is on- board control experiments of dynamic quadrotor flight. Though the LBmpcIPM method has better asymptotic computational complexity than LSSOL and qpOASES, we find that for certain integrated systems (like our quadrotor testbed) these methods can outperform LBmpcIPM. This suggests that actual benchmarks should be used when choosing which algorithm is used to implement LBMPC on practical systems.

Year:

2014
Type of Publication:

(04)Technical Report
Supervisor:



File Download:

Request a copy of this publication.
(Uses JavaScript)
% Autogenerated BibTeX entry
@TechReport { AswEtal:2014:IFA_4840,
    author={A. Aswani and P. Bouffard and X. Zhang and C. J. Tomlin},
    title={{Practical Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for
	  Learning-Based MPC with Linear Models}},
    institution={},
    year={2014},
    number={},
    address={},
    month=apr,
    url={http://control.ee.ethz.ch/index.cgi?page=publications;action=details;id=4840}
}
Permanent link